| "Ranma 1/2: The Reluctant Succubus" Reviews/Comments [ 15 ] |
Reviewed By: A>J> On: December 13, 2006 20:51 CST
Comment/Review:
How can it be "young adult" and "not suitable for children under the age of 17" at the same time?
|
Reviewed By: TirGhost On: December 09, 2004 03:35 CST
Rating(s):Overall Rating: 10 of 10 Comment/Review:
Now that was pretty good. Wish you would continue it.
|
Reviewed By: martinez81 On: September 04, 2003 07:31 CDT
Rating(s):Style of Writing: 10 of 10
Spelling & Grammar: 10 of 10
Originality/Creativity: 10 of 10
Enjoyment Factor: 10 of 10
Comment/Review:
well, what can i say itīs a very good story and u really want to know more about the other succubus and the olans for ranma and the senshi, i just hope you update soon. |
Reviewed By: D.B. On: August 20, 2003 15:01 CDT
Rating(s):Style of Writing: 10 of 10
Spelling & Grammar: 10 of 10
Originality/Creativity: 10 of 10
Enjoyment Factor: 10 of 10
Overall Rating: 10 of 10 Comment/Review:
original, inovative, and fun |
Reviewed By: Lord_Raa [MediaMiner Member] On: June 12, 2003 05:16 CDT
Comment/Review:
You are writing more of this aren't you?
Well, you better be!
On a side note, part of this reminds me of the adventures of Grey, the reluctant inccubus for Metroanime's Labor series. |
Reviewed By: TaiKhanA On: February 07, 2003 05:29 CST
Rating(s):Style of Writing: 5 of 10
Spelling & Grammar: 6 of 10
Originality/Creativity: 5 of 10
Enjoyment Factor: 5 of 10
Overall Rating: 6 of 10 Comment/Review:
An interesting concept, and one I've considered doing myself, at one time or another. However, it's difficult for me to see Akane as studying magic, as opposed to her sister Nabiki, or even Kasumi.
Also, rendering Ranma, or Ranko as you've chosen to name her, incapable of returning to his birth form, seems to detract from the overall genre of the Ranma 1/2 universe. Not to mention doing away with the original appearance of Ranma-chan, and making Ranko apparently gender sensitive in the reverse from canon. Seemingly, your version of Ranma has given up any interest in returning to her original gender. |
Reviewed By: Saberwulfe On: February 06, 2003 12:16 CST
Comment/Review:
AAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHH!
(Ahem, please write more...please...) |
Reviewed By: King_Sage [MediaMiner Member] On: January 13, 2003 17:20 CST
Comment/Review:
Excelent, despite lack of lemons ;) just kidding, I really like it though, nice work.
Two more words, "More Please." |
Reviewed By: Toolman19 On: January 07, 2003 21:24 CST
Comment/Review:
Very interesting idea, would like to see more, maybe a bit more depth of the changes that the characters have gone through. |
Reviewed By: Cyber Angel [MediaMiner Member] On: November 24, 2002 18:09 CST
Comment/Review:
Love what I have seen so far and I can not wait to see the next part. |
Reviewed By: Huge On: November 23, 2002 22:38 CST
Rating(s):Style of Writing: 9 of 10
Spelling & Grammar: 10 of 10
Originality/Creativity: 9 of 10
Enjoyment Factor: 10 of 10
Overall Rating: 9 of 10 Comment/Review:
Not bad at all. |
Reviewed By: richexs On: November 23, 2002 10:58 CST
Rating(s):Style of Writing: 7 of 10
Spelling & Grammar: 8 of 10
Originality/Creativity: 10 of 10
Enjoyment Factor: 10 of 10
Overall Rating: 9 of 10 Comment/Review:
A very good start, I hope to be reading more of this. I like the way you have the three sisters interacting with Ranko. |
Reviewed By: Chaos On: December 06, 2002 16:29 CST
Rating(s):Style of Writing: 10 of 10
Spelling & Grammar: 10 of 10
Originality/Creativity: 10 of 10
Enjoyment Factor: 10 of 10
Overall Rating: 10 of 10 Comment/Review:
damn funny story. very original with ranma's curesd form.update soon and keep up the good work. |
Reviewed By: Brian On: November 29, 2002 17:44 CST
Rating(s):Style of Writing: 8 of 10
Spelling & Grammar: 9 of 10
Originality/Creativity: 7 of 10
Enjoyment Factor: 8 of 10
Overall Rating: 8 of 10 Comment/Review:
It's a good start; it reminds me somewaht of Ranma 3e. It feels like Ranma is a little too experienced/knowledgeable for this to feel quite Ranma-esque, but that's not necessarily a flaw. |
Reviewed By: CRose [MediaMiner Member] On: October 07, 2002 11:23 CDT
Comment/Review:
Hey, not bad. I got a kick out of this ^_^ lets see a little more. |
